How To Set Investment Goals

A sound investment plan begins by determining your objectives while understanding any limitations or constraints that may exist. While most objectives are long-term, a plan must be designed to persevere through changing market environments and be able to adjust for unseen events along the way. If you have multiple goals, each of these goals needs to be taken into consideration. Once developed, a plan needs to be reviewed at regular intervals.

Consideration should be given to your time-horizon for each goal within the plan. For example, if college education expenses will be incurred in 10 years, while retirement is 25 years off, then the plan needs to consider these different time-horizons and plan accordingly.

Understanding your time horizon will impact which investment strategy you select for your portfolio. The shorter the time period to achieve a particular goal, the less risk you would want to take, because a significant market drop may impact the amount of money available to withdraw or the opportunity to benefit from a market rebound later. It is also important to give some thought to your tolerance for market volatility and loss, as well as your ability and willingness to contribute money into the plan each year. Higher returns often come with greater risk, so the trade-off is one that needs to be understood and chosen carefully.

Create a Plan

Without a plan, many investors take an ad-hoc approach to building a portfolio, focusing on acquiring popular investments rather than considering how the entire portfolio is constructed to meet their objectives. Many investors’ actions are influenced by the performance of the broad stock market, with a tendency to increase stock exposure when markets are moving higher, and reducing stock exposure when markets are falling. This behavior may result in investors buying high and selling low and may cause them to underperform market averages by substantial amounts over long market cycles. Mutual fund flows confirm this notion, with individual investors buying equity mutual funds just prior to market peaks and selling them just prior to market bottoms.


The value of diversification should not be ignored. It is important in building a portfolio to select a combination of assets that offer a reasonable chance to achieve your objective because asset allocation is responsible for almost 90% of a diversified portfolio’s return over time. Recall that from 1926 through 2013, a 100% bond portfolio returned an average 5.5% annually, while a 100% stock portfolio returned an average 10.2% each year. A 50% bond, 50% stock portfolio returned an average of 8.3% each year. But over shorter periods, the results can vary significantly from these long-term averages. For example, for the period 2000 through 2013, U.S. stocks returned an average 4.3% annually, while U.S. bonds returned an average 5.7% annually. Looking forward, the return for bonds may be lower than that achieved over the past 10 to 15 years, because interest rates are most likely to be increasing over the next decade, resulting in lower bond prices.

By diversifying across both asset classes (stocks and bonds) and also within each asset class, a portfolio’s risk is often reduced. Various asset classes and sectors of the market often perform differently from one another and diversification spreads the risk and the opportunity. Owning a diversified portfolio with exposure to many different asset classes and segments allows you to participate in stronger areas of the market and reduce the impact of the weaker areas.

If you follow these steps in setting investment goals and implement a detailed plan for achieving them, you will be well on your way to achieving financial success and peace of mind! If you would like to explore how to meet your goals or how well you are diversified, a Pinnacle Wealth Manager would be pleased to help.

Copyright: convisum / 123RF Stock Photo

Gameplan For A Market Hangover

The first quarter picked up where the fourth quarter left off, with equity markets celebrating the surprise of a new U.S. administration that global investors perceived to be more business friendly than the previous one. During the quarter, stocks rallied around the world and along with a pullback in the U.S. dollar and signs that global growth was slowly reviving, many international stocks enjoyed gains in excess of the U.S. While the stock market roared, the bond and commodity markets were less enthused, as bonds bounced and commodities gave back some of the gains that accrued towards the end of the year. By the end of the quarter the equity markets were mostly calm, but with tensions that were beginning to build and signal that some of the election-driven luster was beginning to wear off.

Read more →

Hangovers & Roadmaps

2016 began with a thud and ended with a bang. After one of the worst-ever starts to a year, U.S. stocks managed to rebound and ultimately finish the year with solid gains. Much of the rise came in the final few weeks of the year, following the surprising results of the U.S. presidential election. Indeed, there has been an abrupt change in market sentiment, and asset prices have largely taken their cues from a recalibration of economic expectations in the wake of the surprising Trump victory and Republican sweep of Congress.

Read more →

The Financial Pros and Cons of Renouncing Your Citizenship

The main reason people renounce their U.S. citizenship is to take advantage of lower tax burdens abroad, but the growing unease with U.S. politics might also be contributing to a record number of Americans who are renouncing their citizenship and surrendering their passports. While we don’t recommend this to our clients, we have received questions about the financial pros and cons of leaving behind one’s U.S. citizenship. In the interest of keeping you fully informed, we sat down with Raoul Rodriguez, a Pinnacle Wealth Manager and resident expert on expatriate issues, to discuss the question.

Read more →

A Low Conviction World: Q3 2016 Market Review

The third quarter was a fairly placid one for investors, though there was major diversity in return profiles depending on what asset class, sector, or country one was invested in. In the U.S., the leading sector was clearly technology stocks, while elsewhere, Japan, Emerging Markets, and European stocks also had positive returns for the quarter. Within fixed income, the broad bond market indices slowed down and posted flat returns, though credit related sectors performed well along with other risk assets. Commodities brought up the rear in the third quarter, as they cooled off from their torrid run in the first half of the year. Summing it up, returns by asset class were mixed, but most investors in globally diversified portfolios enjoyed modest gains during the period.

With the third quarter in the books, the focus now turns to assessing prospects for the fourth quarter and beyond.

Read more →

REITs Get Their Own Space

On September 19, 2016, S&P Dow Jones and MSCI, Inc. added a sector for Real Estate. Up to this point, REITs have traditionally been considered a sub-industry and part of the Financial sector, but as of the market close on August 31, 2016 (and effective September 19, 2016), they were split from the Financial sector and moved to their own sector (with the exception of Mortgage REITs). This should not be a surprise for investors, as the change had been announced by index providers, S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI, back in March 2015.

Read more →

Investing in A Post-Brexit World

After a tumultuous first quarter, the second quarter brought some relief as most assets were able to rebound to varying degrees. From a big picture perspective, U.S. stocks have been oscillating in a wide range that dates back to the fourth quarter of 2014. In other words, for the last year and a half, stocks have made almost no upside progress, while being subjected to several brief but vicious selloffs. This type of choppy, sideways action is frustrating for both bulls and bears as long as stocks remain within the current range. Global stocks are in a much more precarious state, with only modest recoveries that left many markets still well below their highs of a year ago (or longer).

Read more →